Here.
I have to add that any review that opens with an assessment of the scholar’s “star” is suspicious, but in this case it’s just a bad stylistic move and the review is fairly decent (in that it tells you what the book is about and so on).
Here.
I have to add that any review that opens with an assessment of the scholar’s “star” is suspicious, but in this case it’s just a bad stylistic move and the review is fairly decent (in that it tells you what the book is about and so on).