The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (lecture)


Quite by accident I came across this lecture about human rights by the intellectual historian Samuel Moyn.

Moyn’s latest book, due out September, is called The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Here’s the blurb from Harvard UP:

Human rights offer a vision of international justice that today’s idealistic millions hold dear. Yet the very concept on which the movement is based became familiar only a few decades ago when it profoundly reshaped our hopes for an improved humanity. In this pioneering book, Samuel Moyn elevates that extraordinary transformation to center stage and asks what it reveals about the ideal’s troubled present and uncertain future.

For some, human rights stretch back to the dawn of Western civilization, the age of the American and French Revolutions, or the post–World War II moment when the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was framed. Revisiting these episodes in a dramatic tour of humanity’s moral history, The Last Utopia shows that it was in the decade after 1968 that human rights began to make sense to broad communities of people as the proper cause of justice. Across eastern and western Europe, as well as throughout the United States and Latin America, human rights crystallized in a few short years as social activism and political rhetoric moved it from the hallways of the United Nations to the global forefront.

It was on the ruins of earlier political utopias, Moyn argues, that human rights achieved contemporary prominence. The morality of individual rights substituted for the soiled political dreams of revolutionary communism and nationalism as international law became an alternative to popular struggle and bloody violence. But as the ideal of human rights enters into rival political agendas, it requires more vigilance and scrutiny than when it became the watchword of our hopes.

3 thoughts on “The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (lecture)

    • Honestly, it’s not all that fresh in my head, I remember finding it really interesting, well-argued and for the most part, convincing. That said, “quick and dirty,” I’m still somewhat wary of the idea that Levinas’s turn to ethics is “crypto-theological.” The broader claim (1) Levinas cannot be fully understood unless we admit he’s somehow secularizing a Protestant theology of the encounter a la Karl Barth, and (2) L invents a form of Judaism based on this Protestant existential theology is only a part of the story. I’m skeptical that one could isolate a clear, intellectual origin and if I remember correctly, there’s very little treatment of L’s “Jewish” writings. I remember thinking one of the flaws in the book is that Moyn simply assumes (like say Kant) that there is some sort of “authentic form of Judaism” or “authentic Jewish difference” that we can point to, but again, I’d have to re-read the book to know for sure.

      Anyway, I just now received a copy of Faganblat’s _A Covenant of Creatures_ which suggests a completely different story than Moyn, so I wanted to re-read _Origins of the Other_ before I look at Faganblat’s book. In fact, I came across Moyn’s lecture above when I was looking for a cheap copy of his first book.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s